As we reflect on the differences between hard and soft-sided hyperbaric chambers, we turn to the work of two of the leading minds in the field: Dr. Jason Sonners and Dr. Zayd Ratansi.
While hard chambers can be essential in emergency settings, both doctors raise an important question:
Are the increased risks and costs of high-pressure HBOT always necessary?
What the Research Shows
Dr. Jason Sonners, author of Oxygen Under Pressure, documents extensive clinical success using soft chambers at 1.3 to 1.5 ATA for long-term wellness, neurological repair, immune modulation, and tissue recovery. He explains that mild pressures still stimulate vital processes like angiogenesis, mitochondrial biogenesis, and stem cell release without the elevated risks.
“Just because the chamber can go to 3.0 ATA does not mean it should. More is not always better. It is about finding the therapeutic window for each person’s biology.” — Dr. Jason Sonners, DC, DIBAK, DCBCN
Dr. Zayd Ratansi, a world leader in integrative HBOT, trains practitioners around the globe in evidence-based use of soft chambers. He emphasizes combining mild HBOT with detoxification, nutrition, and light therapy for accelerated healing and reduced inflammation.
“We are seeing world-class results using soft chambers when paired with proper nutrition, detox pathways, and light-based therapies.” — Dr. Zayd Ratansi, ND
The Takeaway
Hard chambers are essential for specific, life-threatening conditions, but they are not required for everyone. For most people seeking long-term repair, peak performance, and holistic vitality, mild HBOT provides a safer, more sustainable option.
References
Sonners, Jason. Oxygen Under Pressure. HBOT USA, 2020.
HBOT USA. www.hbotusa.com
Ratansi, Zayd. Clinical Protocols in Integrative Hyperbaric Therapy. www.hbotglobal.com